African elephants Loxodonta africana and human‐elephant interactions: implications for conservation

By Phyllis C. Lee, M. Graham. 2006

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Geography, Planning and Development, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e325b25f0980cabdfdad2a29b08297b545397989

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Phyllis C. Lee
2. W. Adams
3. M. Graham
4. I. Douglas-Hamilton
5. George Wittemyer

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. W. Adams
2. Phyllis C. Lee
3. M. Graham

Citations in the corpus

• The movement of African elephants in a human‐dominated land‐use mosaic (2009, background): “The human– elephant conflict that results undermines local livelihoods and creates hostility to wider conservation programmes (Hoare, 2000; Lee & Graham, 2006).”
• Assessing translocation outcome: Comparing behavioral and physiological aspects of translocated and resident African elephants (Loxodonta africana) (2009, unknown): “African elephants are placed in the paradoxical position of being simultaneously a vulnerable species which needs to be conserved (IUCN, 2004), and a pest due to human–elephant conflict resulting from human encroachment onto elephant habitat (Hoare, 1999, 2000; Lee and Graham, 2006).”
• Patterns of crop-raiding by elephants, Loxodonta africana, in Laikipia, Kenya, and the management of human–elephant conflict (2010, background): “Sustained political and media interest in the problem presents a considerable challenge to in-situ conservation of elephants (Lee & Graham, 2006).”