Problems due to small samples and sparse data in conditional logistic regression analysis.
By Sander Greenland, J. Schwartzbaum, W. Finkle. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
357 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2dd7acdd8a39d359066c5799cbb5363a5b51ad1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- A. Genkin
- David D. Lewis
- David Madigan
- Joonho Ko
- Tae-Hyoung Tommy Gim
- Jinchi Lv
- Cun-Hui Zhang
- Peter Buhlmann
Citations in the corpus
- Maximum Likelihood and Firth Logistic Regression of the Pedestrian Route Choice (2017, background): “Anyhow, all categories had their counts enough for logistic regression, that is, equal to or more than 5 (Greenland, Schwartzbaum, and Finkle 2000).”
- Large-Scale Bayesian Logistic Regression for Text Categorization (2007, background): “Exact logistic regression suffers from many of the same problems (Greenland, Schwartzbaum, and Finkle 2000).”
- Inflammatory and Coagulation Biomarkers and Mortality in Patients with HIV Infection (2008, unknown): “To investigate the possibility that these large ORs were due to sparse data [27], the number of covariates considered [28], or outliers, four sensitivity analyses were performed: (1) conditional logistic models that included only baseline covariates that were significant at the 0.10 level in a…”