Geographical separation of two Ulex species at three spatial scales: does competition limit species' ranges?

By J. Bullock, R. J. Edwards, P. Carey, R. Rose. 2000

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2d4c2b1345f134ed2fb4720f40c428fe3335738

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modelling (2012, background): “One example that may suggest competition at broad spatial scales is a study of two congeneric heathland shrub species (genus Ulex) which show strong negative associations at three spatial scales of investigation (Bullock et al., 2000).”
Niche and area of distribution modeling: a population ecology perspective (2010, background): “…the biotic component may be dominated by the environmental (Shmida and Wilson 1985, Pearson and Dawson 2003, Soberón 2007), although there is mounting evidence that, at least in certain cases, biotic interactions are significant at large extents (Bullock et al. 2000, Leathwick and Austin 2001).”
Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail? (2007, background): “For example, the two gorse species Ulex minor and U. gallii exclude each other where their ranges meet in southern England [ 58 ] ,t o the extent that there are no mixed stands even at local scales.”
The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela (2010, background): “congeners show parapatric distributions suggestive of competitive interactions (Koplin & Hoffmann, 1968; Bullock et al., 2000; Anderson et al., 2002b).”
Mechanistic and Correlative Models of Ecological Niches (2015, background): “Ideally, also, hypotheses would be available regarding presence or absence of any strong interactor species that might be involved (Bullock et al. 2000; Leathwick & Austin 2001).”