The species–accumulation curve and estimation of species richness

By K. I. Ugland, J. Gray, K. Ellingsen. 2003

621 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2bb0b427e560d044ef3a6c274006d83f231e8ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

The Antarctic-Magellan connection: Macrobenthos ecology on the shelf and upper slope, a progress report (2005, methodology): “Gutt et al. (2004) made an extrapolation using species accumulation approaches (Ugland et al., 2003) and calculation of the unknown number of species, which were not represented in the samples, as a function of the rare species (Colwell, 1997), arriving at an estimate for total macrozoobenthic…”
Vegan: ecological diversity (2016, neutral): “Kindt’s exact accumulator resembles rarefaction (Ugland et al., 2003):”
INTERPOLATING, EXTRAPOLATING, AND COMPARING INCIDENCE-BASED SPECIES ACCUMULATION CURVES (2004, methodology): “Ugland et al. (2003) independently arrived at a combinatorial interpolation estimator that is mathematically equivalent to Eq.”
The Gray Zone: Relationships between habitat loss and marine diversity and their applications in conservation (2008, background): “The risk of extinction for these species can be estimated with the use of species-area relationships (Ugland et al., 2003; Thrush et al., 2006) or using population or metapopulation models (Hanski, 2005).”
Multiple drift responses of benthic invertebrates to interacting hydropeaking and thermopeaking waves (2013, methodology): “Finally, we calculated the total number of taxa collected in the three simulations by plotting the cumulative taxa count against drift number, using the calculated species accumulation curve (Ugland et al., 2003) as an estimator.”
Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. (2007, background): “For example, better species accumulation (and species area) curves can be achieved by taking the abundance ⁄ occupancy relationship into account (He et al. 2002; Ugland et al. 2003).”
How many macrozoobenthic species might inhabit the Antarctic shelf? (2004, methodology): “The non-consideration of spatial covariance can lead to an additional “large underestimation” e.g. for the Chao2 index especially for sparse samples of large size (Ugland et al. 2003).”
How well do we know the Antarctic marine fauna? A preliminary study of macroecological and biogeographical patterns in Southern Ocean gastropod and bivalve molluscs (2007, background): “…of most sampling has meant that we have had to use frequency of occurrence (that is, the number of sites at which a given species has been recorded) as a proxy for abundance, and secondly, the shape of a rarefaction curve is affected strongly by species abundance structure (Ugland et al., 2003).”
Microbial macroecology: highly structured prokaryotic soil assemblages in a tropical deciduous forest (2005, methodology): “We used EstimateS version 7.0 (Colwell, 2004) to calculate the points of our rarefaction curves, using the procedures of Colwell et al. (2004) that allow the exact calculation of expected diversity values and associated variances for any number of samples (see also Ugland et al., 2003 ).”
Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages (2012, methodology): “In contrast, traditional variance estimators for rarefaction (e.g. Heck et al. 1975; Ugland et al. 2003) are conditional on the sample data, so that the confidence interval closes to zero at the full-sample end of the curve, making valid comparisons of curves and their confidence intervals inappropr”
Securing the conservation of biodiversity across administrative levels and spatial, temporal, and ecological scales - Research needs and approaches of the SCALES project (2010, background): “Recent work (Ugland et al. 2003, Harte et al. 2009) also suggests a novel possibility for communi - ty level assessments: building up estimates of species-area relationships from scattered point biodiversity samples.”
Does pollen-assemblage richness reflect floristic richness? A review of recent developments and future challenges (2016, positive): “…2004; Kindt and Coe, 2005; Kindt, 2014; Terlizzi et al., 2014) and to 841 compare richness, evenness, and diversity properties of different assemblages (e.g. Gotelli and 842 Colwell, 2001; Ugland et al., 2003; Colwell et al., 2004; Magurran, 2004, 2011; Kindt et al., 2006; 843 McGill, 2011).”