Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests

By Arjen Boin, Paul ‘t Hart, Allan McConnell. 2009

712 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2b1b4c0b8a5d05ed2abc1017b0424bb2029968d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Public Administration

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Revisiting the study of policy failures (2016, background): “In other words, the verdict about a public policy, programme or project is shaped in ongoing ‘framing contests’ between its advocates and shapers on the one hand, and its critics and victims on the other (Boin et al. 2009).”
Crisis, learning and policy change in the European Union (2017, background): “Inter-crisis management allows time to learn lessons between a crisis and the next – although this does not mean that learning processes are necessarily smooth (Birkland 2004; Boin et al. 2009; Nohrstedt 2009; Stern 1997).”
The Logic of Policy Change after Crisis : Proximity and Subsystem Interaction (2010, background): “ordinary political and bureaucratic processes (Boin et al. 2009; Widmaier et al. 2007).”
Institutional and political leadership dimensions of cascading ecological crises (2011, background): “Blame games are well known for crippling the ability of actors to learn and reform after large-scale crises (Moynihan 2008; Boin et al. 2009), a topic seldom explored by scholars of social-ecological systems (see, for example, Dietz et al.”
Harnessing theories of the policy process for analysing the politics of sustainability transitions: A critical survey (2017, background): “A dedicated literature addresses how actors strategically exploit crises and the ensuing framing contests (Boin et al. 2009).”
Anticipatory and reactive forms of blame avoidance: of foxes and lions (2016, neutral): “…actors can apply during reactive blame games, ranging from justi ﬁ cation (McGraw, 1991; Green-Pedersen, 2002), discourse (Schmidt, 2001), rhetoric (Cox, 2001), and framing (Ross, 2000; Druckman, 2001; Boin et al ., 2009), to persuasion and priming (see König and Wenzelburger 2014 for an overview).”