SCALING OF C:N:P STOICHIOMETRY IN FORESTS WORLDWIDE: IMPLICATIONS OF TERRESTRIAL REDFIELD‐TYPE RATIOS

By M. McGroddy, T. Daufresne, L. Hedin. 2004

1,101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e2a17423f9a54e2cc14ff70cc4a62a609aaad474

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. R. Sinsabaugh
2. S. Hall
3. D. Moorhead
4. Jordi Sardans
5. Andreas Richter
6. C. Cleveland
7. Josep Peñuelas
8. James J. Elser

In Oceanography

1. S. Hall
2. D. Moorhead
3. Andreas Richter
4. R. Sinsabaugh
5. Jordi Sardans
6. Han Y. H. Chen
7. James J. Elser
8. Amber N. Brant

In Soil Science

1. R. Sinsabaugh
2. C. Cleveland
3. Jordi Sardans
4. A. Townsend
5. S. Allison
6. Josep Peñuelas
7. D. Moorhead
8. Peter B. Reich

Citations in the corpus

• A conceptual framework for ecosystem stoichiometry: balancing resource supply and demand (2005, background): “The shifting stoichiometric templates along developmental or latitudinal gradients cause variations in stoichiometric schemes in terrestrial ecosystems, reflected in changes in foliar nutrients that correspond to changes in soil nutrients (Table 1, McGroddy et al. 2004).”
• Connecting the green and brown worlds . allometric and stoichiometric predictability of above- and below-ground networks (2013, background): “:P ratios, which tend to increase with latitude (Kerkhoff et al., 2005; McGroddy et al., 2004; Reich and Oleksyn, 2004; see also Chen et al., 2013; Hedin, 2004; Sardans et al., 2012a, for discussions).”
• Impacts of Nitrogen and Phosphorus: From Genomes to Natural Ecosystems and Agriculture (2017, background): “For example, N:P ratios range from 21:1 in broadleaved forests to 43:1 in tropical forests (McGroddy et al., 2004), while a more general ratio of 28:1 has been attributed to vascular plants (Chapin et al.”
• Response of microbial diversity to C:N:P stoichiometry in fine root and microbial biomass following afforestation (2017, background): “:P ratios of fine root biomass differ among species , ecosystems, and biomes (Bell et al. 2014; McGroddy et al. 2004; Mooshammer et al. 2014).”
• The Nitrogen Paradox in Tropical Forest Ecosystems (2009, background): “Adapted from McGroddy et al. (2004).”
• C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? (2007, background): “In addi­ tion, in spite of observed differences in plant element ratios across broadly-dehned vegetation types and latitudes (Reich and Oleksyn 2004; McGroddy et al. 2004), soil nutrient ratios did not vary signihcantly between forests and grasslands (Table 1).”
• Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. (2005, background): “On average, leaf N : P ratios increase from the poles towards the equator, presumably related to latitudinal trends in temperature and biogeographical gradients in soil substrate age (McGroddy et al ., 2004; Reich & Oleksyn, 2004).”
• The Functional Significance of Ribosomal (r)DNA Variation: Impacts on the Evolutionary Ecology of Organisms (2005, background): “…as one moves to high latitudes (Conover & Schultz 1995), suggesting that arctic biota should be more P-rich than those in temperate and tropical regions, a pattern documented in recent studies of vascular plants (McGroddy et al. 2004, Reich & Oleksyn 2004) and in Daphnia (Elser et al. 2000a).”
• Altitudinal variation in leaf mass per unit area, leaf tissue density and foliar nitrogen and phosphorus content along an Amazon-Andes gradient in Peru (2009, background): “( 2004 ) found a higher mean ± SE N:P ratio in tropical leaves (43.”