The phylogeny of the ‘higher’ temnospondyls (Vertebrata: Choanata) and its implications for the monophyly and origins of the Stereospondyli

By A. Yates, A. Warren. 2000

258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e29dd702d7080ff73962c11cc7bc0ebd88e70d2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Schoch
2. Claudia Marsicano
3. B. Rubidge
4. A. Warren
5. J. Bolt
6. T. Sigurdsen

In Paleontology

1. R. Schoch
2. Claudia Marsicano
3. B. Rubidge
4. A. Warren
5. S. Nesbitt
6. J. Bolt
7. T. Sigurdsen

Citations in the corpus

• THE AMPHIBAMID MICROPHOLIS FROM THE LYSTROSAURUS ASSEMBLAGE ZONE OF SOUTH AFRICA (2005, background): “Despite its morphological diversity—the eight currently recognized temnospondyl genera represent a vast range of ecomorphotypes—all but one species belong to the dominant Triassic clade Stereospondyli (Schoch and Milner, 2000; Yates and Warren, 2000).”
• The evolution of major temnospondyl clades: an inclusive phylogenetic analysis (2013, methodology): “Euskelia is based on characters whose derived states evidently evolved independently in eryopids and dissorophoids, and Limnarchia results from postcranial features correlated with an aquatic life in dvinosaurians and stereospondylomorphs, as well as a dentition character not consistently present in”
• A PHYLOGENY OF THE BRACHYOPOIDEA (TEMNOSPONDYLI, STEREOSPONDYLI) (2000, methodology): “In the analysis, Bothriceps falls outside the definition of Brachyopoidea (Yates and Warren, 2000) as a result of the presence of many plesiomorphies in that taxon.”