Audio Chord Recognition with Recurrent Neural Networks
By Nicolas Boulanger-Lewandowski, Yoshua Bengio, Pascal Vincent. 2013
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Felix Stahlberg
- Graham Neubig
- Yoshua Bengio
- Jianfeng Gao
- Mohit Bansal
- Hinrich Schütze
- Christopher D. Manning
Citations in the corpus
- Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate (2014, methodology): “, Graves, 2012; Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013). Sutskever et al. (2014) used this approach to generate translations from their neural machine translation model.”
- On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder–Decoder Approaches (2014, methodology): “The beam-search to (approximately) find a sequence of maximum log-probability under RNN was proposed and used successfully in (Graves, 2012) and (Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013).”
- Montreal Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT’15 (2015, positive): “4 Translations were generated by beam search, with a beam width of 20, trying to find the sentence with the highest log-probability (single model), or highest average log-probability over all models (ensemble), divided by the sentence length (Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013).”
- Deep Learning: Methods and Applications (2014, methodology): “The RNN has also been recently applied to music processing applications [22, 40, 41], where the use of ReLU hidden units instead of logistic or tanh nonlinearities are explored in the RNN.”
- Describing Multimedia Content Using Attention-Based Encoder-Decoder Networks (2015, background): “Instead of stochastic sampling, it is possible to approximately find a sentence sample that maximizes the probability using, for instance, beam search [8], [9].”
- An Empirical Study on Learning Bug-Fixing Patches in the Wild via Neural Machine Translation (2018, methodology): “To this aim, we employ a different decoding strategy called Beam Search, used in previous applications of deep learning [6, 9, 21, 67].”
- Overcoming the Curse of Sentence Length for Neural Machine Translation using Automatic Segmentation (2014, methodology): “(3) We use an approximate beam search to search for the candidate translations fk of eij , that maximize log-likelihood log p(fk|eij) (Graves et al., 2013; Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013).”
- Beam Search Strategies for Neural Machine Translation (2017, methodology): “The original beam search for sequence to sequence models has been introduced and described by (Graves, 2012; Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013) and by (Sutskever et al., 2014) for neural machine translation.”
- A Divide-and-Conquer Approach to the Summarization of Academic Articles (2020, methodology): “At test time, we autoregressively generate a summary for each section of the input text one word at a time using simple beam search decoding [33, 34].”
- Correcting Length Bias in Neural Machine Translation (2018, methodology): “Length normalization divides the score by m (Koehn and Knowles, 2017; Jean et al., 2015; Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013): Google’s NMT system (Wu et al., 2016) relies on a more complicated correction: Finally, some systems add a constant word reward (He et al., 2016): If γ = 0, this reduces to…”
- An End-to-End Neural Network for Polyphonic Piano Music Transcription (2015, background): “There are many experiments in MIR that suggest that rather than classifying a single frame of input, better prediction accuracies can be achieved by incorporating information over several frames of inputs [26], [33], [34].”
- Neural Machine Translation: A Review (2019, methodology): “A simple method is called length normalization which divides the NMT probability by the sentence length (Jean et al., 2015b; Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013):”
- Few-Shot Text Generation with Pattern-Exploiting Training (2020, methodology): “To this end, we first compute the normalized log-likelihood of y for each ( P i , d i ) as where we divide by the length of y to correct for length bias (Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013; Jean et al., 2015).”
- A Stable and Effective Learning Strategy for Trainable Greedy Decoding (2018, methodology): “…since the space of all possible output sequences is infinite and grows exponentially with sequence length, heuristic search methods such as greedy decoding or beam search (Graves, 2012; Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013) must be used at decoding time to select high-probability output sequences.”
- OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocation (2023, unknown): “Our OPERA is based on the Beam Search [3, 16, 37], which is a accumulated-score-based decoding strategy.”
- A Divide-and-Conquer Approach to the Summarization of Long Documents (2020, methodology): “Then, we autoregressively generate a summary for each section of the input text using simple beam search decoding [48], [49] and compose the complete summary by concatenating the individual summaries.”
- On NMT Search Errors and Model Errors: Cat Got Your Tongue? (2019, methodology): “A popular method to counter the length bias in NMT is length normalization (Jean et al., 2015; Boulanger-Lewandowski et al., 2013) which simply divides the sentence score by the sentence length.”