The spatial resolution of visual attention.

By J. Intriligator, Patrick Cavanagh. Cognitive Psychology, 2001

745 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e27b0b2b408a20db9d6ffd4a4907c72b07ee8a75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Citations in the corpus

Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. (2006, background): “The dichotomy between visual acuity and visual attention has been exemplified by many studies (Ball, Beard, Roenker, Miller, & Griggs, 1988; Ball & Owsley, 1991; Ball, Owsley, & Beard, 1990; Ball, Owsley, Sloane, Roenker, & Bruni, 1993; Intriligator & Cavanagh, 2001; Owsley & Ball, 1993; Owsley, B”
How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. (2007, methodology): “To explore this ability in the laboratory, researchers have employed the multiple object tracking task (Pylyshyn & Storm, 1988).”
Adaptive Resonance Theory: How a brain learns to consciously attend, learn, and recognize a changing world (2013, background): “How is seeing related to recognition, and how does recognition of individual objects fail during conditions of perceptual crowding (Green & Bavelier, 2007; He, Cavanagh, & Intriligator, 1996; Intriligator & Cavanagh, 2001; Levi, 2008)?”
Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach (2007, background): “Since the spatial resolution of pre-attentive vision is very limited [5].”
Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. (2004, methodology): “In an influential paper, Intriligator and Cavanagh (2001) used the crowding paradigm to measure “the spatial resolution of attention.””
Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review. (2008, background): “Several of these ideas are outlined below.”
A taxonomy of external and internal attention. (2011, positive): “Resolution deteriorates dramatically moving out into the periphery (Intriligator & Cavanagh 2001), affecting the ability to individuate and identify two targets appearing close to another.”
Perceptual-Cognitive Training of Athletes (2012, background): “…property of visual processing, and it is proposed herein that the binocular 3D may possibly help relieve the spatial limitations of attention inherent in two-dimensional scenes (Intriligator & Cavanagh, 2001) when rapid decisions are required by the perceptual system during fast moving scenes.”
A neural model of figure-ground organization. (2007, neutral): “…of this kind led to the conclusion that the spatial resolution of attention is five to 20 times lower than visual resolution for two-point discrimination (the factor depends on eccentricity; the given range corresponds to eccentricities between 0.5 and 15°; Intriligator and Cavanagh 2001).”
Modeling attention to salient proto-objects (2006, neutral): “…Duncan, & Desimone, 2001; Connor, Preddie, Gallant, & van Essen, 1997; Luck, Chelazzi, Hillyard, & Desimone, 1997; McAdams & Maunsell, 2000; Moran & Desimone, 1985; Motter, 1994; Reynolds, Pasternak, & Desimone, 2000) as well as human psychophysics (Braun, 1994; Intriligator & Cavanagh, 2001).”
Attentional Selection for Object Recognition - A Gentle Way (2002, background): “ber of reports from electrophysiology [6, 13–16] and psychophysics [17, 18] that show attentional modulation of V4 activity.”
Attention Routines and the Architecture of Selection (2004, methodology): “We also found that the lower visual field has better selection resolution than the upper (He et al., 1996; Intriligator & Cavanagh, 2001 ).”
Figure-ground mechanisms provide structure for selective attention (2007, background): “Their resolution should be comparable to that of attentio”