Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries

By Paresh Kumar Narayan, Seema W. Narayan. 2010

1,011 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e260f6799bb8f98367f7c8895bddc4826f408aed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Muhammad Shahbaz
2. Ilhan Ozturk
3. Avik Sinha
4. Eyup Dogan
5. Usama Al-mulali
6. Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
7. Anis Omri
8. Mantu Kumar Mahalik

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Muhammad Shahbaz
2. Ilhan Ozturk
3. Avik Sinha
4. Usama Al-mulali
5. Eyup Dogan
6. Anis Omri
7. Sahbi Farhani
8. Mantu Kumar Mahalik

Citations in the corpus

• The contribution of foreign direct investment to clean energy use, carbon emissions and economic growth (2013, background): “More recently, some researchers have examined the time series dynamics between income and CO2 emissions to infer the direction of causality, for example, for the Commonwealth of Independent States (Apergis and Payne, 2010), for a panel of 109 countries (Lee and Lee, 2009), for a panel of 43 developi”
• The technical decomposition of carbon emissions and the concerns about FDI and trade openness effects in the United States (2019, background): “…advantage effect which is one of the decomposed components like the scale effect and the other effects. group of the studies investigates the direct link between per capita income and carbon emissions (Narayan and Narayan, 2010; Shahiduzzaman and Layton, 2015; Narayan et al., 2016).”
• The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: Evidence from panel quantile regression (2016, background): “short-run income elasticity, Narayan and Narayan (2010) argue that in none of the countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand) is the EKC hypothesis supported.”
• Environmental degradation and economic growth: evidence for a developing country (2017, background): “Narayan and Narayan (2010) point out that only in the countries of Middle East and Asia considered in their study, the long-term elasticity of income with respect to carbon dioxide is lower than the short-run elasticity.”
• Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea (2013, background): “…body of literature; a number of studies have sought to investigate the effect of income growth on CO2 emissions, after controlling for nuclear power and/or energy consumption (e.g., Apergis and Payne, 2009; Chang, 2010; Iwata et al., 2011; Narayan and Narayan, 2010; Richmond and Kaufman, 2006).”
• The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan (2018, background): “Study Sample Period Country or Region Explanatory variables Narayan and Narayan (2010) 1980e2004 43 developing countries (including Bahrain, Iran, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, KSA and UAE) COT, GDPT Tamazian and Rao (2010) 1993e2004 24 transition economies (including Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Russia)…”