International Trade Without CES: Estimating Translog Gravity

By D. Novy. 2013

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e260dfd2ae2eda68dcd4517f609624e189180481

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Heterogeneous effects of economic integration agreements (2018, background): “Our theoretical model is distinct from Melitz and Redding (2015) and Novy (2013) by finding theoretically endogenous trade elasticities with respect to trade-policy changes in the context of two assumptions common to the new quantitative trade models: CES preferences and an untruncated Pareto…”
From micro to macro: Demand, supply, and heterogeneity in the trade elasticity ☆ (2017, unknown): “Novy (2013) builds on Feenstra (2003), using the translog demand system with homogeneous firms to obtain variable trade elasticities.”
Nonparametric Counterfactual Predictions in Neoclassical Models of International Trade (2017, methodology): “38 The translog demand system—as used in the Armington context by Novy (2013)—is an important exception not covered by the demand system in (28).”
The cost of non-Europe, revisited* (2019, unknown): “…in the estimated trade elasticity: PPML focuses on the part of the sample with high predicted trade, those have theoretical reasons to have smaller response to trade costs (Novy (2013) and Bas et al. (2017) are two recent examples), therefore we should expect a smaller coeﬃcient on EU integration.”
Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook (2013, unknown): “Both the linear demand system used by Ottaviano et al. (2002) or the translog form used by Feenstra (2003) and Novy (2013) are relatively straightforward to estimate despite not being multiplicatively separable in the Si, Mn and φni terms, and therefore not obeying definition 1.”
Product Mix and Firm Productivity Responses to Trade Competition (2020, methodology): “Novy (2013) uses translog preferences, which satisfy MSLD; Arkolakis et al. (2018) use a general family of preferences with endogenous price elasticities and estimate coefficients that validate MSLD. 5See Syverson (2004), Campbell and Hopenhayn (2005), and Asplund and Nocke (2006).”
What Separates Us? Sources of Resistance to Globalization (2013, unknown): “First, the Novy (2013) translog bilateral trade equation implies a non-constant trade elasticity.”