Measuring love and care for nature

By H. Perkins. 2010

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e25f89089152ef33ce50e5f670d33f25762a1f09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

An occasion for unselfing: Beautiful nature leads to prosociality (2014, background): “For instance, a number of existing measures assess people’s personal connection/ relatedness with nature (Mayer & Frantz, 2004; Nisbet et al., 2009; Perkins, 2010; Schultz, 2000), but research has yet to examine these constructs as potential moderators of nature’s positive benefits (e.”
Brand experience and consumers’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) a price premium: Mediating role of brand credibility and perceived uniqueness (2018, methodology): “We used respondents’ love of nature (Perkins, 2010) as a single-item theoretical marker variable.”
Zoo Visitors' Affective Responses to Observing Animal Behaviors (2016, background): “For instance, psychological scales, such as the Love and Care for Nature Scale (Perkins, 2010), have shown that a person’s emotional disposition toward nature is highly related to his or her pro-environmental behaviors and a willingness to make personal sacrifices to protect the environment.”
The psychological and social benefits of a nature experience for children: A preliminary investigation (2019, background): “To assess state nature connectedness children rated 8 items that measured how they feel towards nature and 7 items about how they think about nature (Perkins, 2010; Silvas, 2013).”
A Multi-dimensional Measure of Environmental Behavior: Exploring the Predictive Power of Connectedness to Nature, Ecological Worldview and Environmental Concern (2018, background): “Other researchers showed a positive relationship between altruistic concerns and CNS (Perkins, 2010).”
A comparative study of relative roles and sequences of cognitive and affective attitudes on tourists’ pro-environmental behavioral intention (2020, background): “Consequently, attitudinal interventions that involve or may explicitly raise the effort of rational cost-benefit analysis of environmental protection should be reduced or used with caution, especially when appealing demanding PEBs in the tourism context.”
Where do biospheric values come from? A connectedness to nature perspective (2017, methodology): “In addition to the Connectedness to Nature scale (CNS, a ¼ 0.80) used in Studies 1 and 2, and the Inclusion of Nature in Self scale (INS) used in Study 2, we also included the Love and Care for Nature scale (LCN; Perkins, 2010).”
Are Some Natural Environments More Psychologically Beneficial Than Others? The Importance of Type and Quality on Connectedness to Nature and Psychological Restoration (2019, background): “…with Nature (Dutcher, Finley, Luloff, & 26 Buttolph Johnson, 2007, e.g., ‘feeling a sense of oneness with nature’) and the Love and Care for Nature Scale 27 (Perkins, 2010, e.g., ‘I often feel emotionally close to nature’) but it is specific to an actual recent visit rather than 28 generic.”
Into the Wild: The Effects of 360° Immersive Nature Videos on Feelings of Commitment to the Environment (2019, background): “…affinity towards nature” (Kals, Schumacher, & Montada, 1999), “connectedness to nature” (Mayer & Frantz, 2004), “connectivity with nature” (Dutcher, Finley, Luloff, & Johnson, 2007), “commitment to the environment” (Davis, Green, & Reed, 2009) and “love and care for nature” (Perkins, 2010).”
The mediating role of place attachment between nature connectedness and human well-being: perspectives from Japan (2019, methodology): “Consistent with the above-mentioned discussion, the following hypothesis is conferred: H1 Nature connectedness has a significant effect on well-being.”
Predictors of Nature Connection Among Urban Residents: Assessing the Role of Childhood and Adult Nature Experiences (2018, background): “The human–nature relationship has been explored from a variety of perspectives, such as the biophilia hypothesis (Wilson, 1984), therapeutic landscapes (Bell, Foley, Houghton, Maddrell, & Williams, 2018; Gesler, 1992, 1993), and place attachment (Scannell & Gifford, 2016), and has been labeled many ”
Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice (2014, background): “…with Nature Scale (CwNS) Dutcher et al. 2007, [32] Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS) Nisbet et al. 2009, [4] Love and Care for Nature (LCN) Perkins 2010, [291] Connection to Nature Index (CNI) Cheng and Monroe 2010, [101] Disposition to Connect with Nature (DCN) Brügger et al. 2011, [292]…”
The extended Inclusion of Nature in Self scale (2016, methodology): “Love and Care for Nature (LCN) 15 items, verbal Perkins (2010) C.”