MANNA: a management architecture for wireless sensor networks

By L. B. Ruiz, J. Nogueira, A. Loureiro. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2003

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Research Directions for the Internet of Things (2014, methodology): “This includes formal methods to develop reliable code, in situ debugging techniques, online fault tolerance, in-field maintenance, and general health monitoring services [23]–[25].”
A Survey of Fault Management in Wireless Sensor Networks (2007, neutral): “These systems include Digest [40], Sympathy [28, 41], NOSY [42], SNMS [43], AgletBus [44, 45], and MANNA [46].”
Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks (2008, methodology): “In this direction, the MANNA architecture [44] was proposed to provide a management solution to different WSN applications.”
Decentralized intrusion detection in wireless sensor networks (2005, methodology): “We have simulated a plan and fixed network [21], with random node distribution.”
M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies (2014, background): “The M2M area network management system design requirements are summarized from [59] and [60] as follows: • Fault tolerance: Manage dead nodes (run out of energy, physical damage) • Scalability: Dense, large number of nodes • Cost and complexity: Low cost, low complexity • Application dependence: Dat”