Randomized consent designs for clinical trials: an update.
By S. Ellenberg. 1992
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Susan Athey
- Guido W. Imbens
- Stefan Wager
- Nathan Kallus
- Alberto Abadie
- Zhiqiang Tan
- Keisuke Hirano
- M. D. Cattaneo
Citations in the corpus
- The Econometrics of Randomized Experiments (2016, background): “Bloom (1984), Zelen (1979, 1990), Baker and Lindeman (1994), Cuzick, Edwards, and Segnan (1997), contain early and independent discussions of the instrumental variables approach, some in the special case of one-sided non-compliance, and Imbens and Angrist (1994), Angrist, Imbens and Rubin (1996)…”
- An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research (2011, methodology): “Covariate adaptive randomization has been recommended by many researchers as a valid alternative randomization method for clinical research.[8,13] In covariate adaptive randomization, a new participant is sequentially assigned to a particular treatment group by taking into account the specific covar”
- Instrumental Variables: An Econometrician's Perspective (2014, unknown): “However, there are also other antecedents, outside of the traditional econometric instrumental variables literature, notably the work by Zelen on encouragement designs (Zelen, 1979, 1990).”
- Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design. (2000, background): “Similar ideas have been considered in other fields by, among others, Zelen (1979, 1990), Hearst et al. (1986), Holland (1988), Permutt and Hebel (1989), Robins (1989), Efron and Feldman (1991), Sommer and Zeger (1991), Baker and Lindeman (1994), McClellan and Newhouse (1994), Pearl (1995), and…”
- Estimating the effect of treatment in a proportional hazards model in the presence of non‐compliance and contamination (2007, methodology): “Individual patient covariates are easily modelled, and this type of analysis is particularly appropriate for the Zelen (1979, 1990) type of randomization model, where consent is sought after randomization.”
- Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with noncompliance (1997, result): “…studies using similar assumptions have also appeared in other literatures, often in the context of randomized experiments with noncompliance [Zelen (1979, 1990), Bloom (1984), Holland (1988), Hearst, Newman and Hulley (1986), Permutt and Hebel (1989), Robins (1989), Sommer and Zeger (1991),…”