Effects of compression on the vibrational modes of marginally jammed solids.

By Matthieu Wyart, L. Silbert, Sidney R. Nagel, T. Witten. 2005

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Glasses have a large excess of low-frequency vibrational modes in comparison with most crystalline solids. We show that such a feature is a necessary consequence of the weak connectivity of the solid, and that the frequency of modes in excess is very sensitive to the pressure. We analyze, in particular, two systems whose density D(omega) of vibrational modes of angular frequency omega display scaling behaviors with the packing fraction: (i) simulations of jammed packings of particles interacting through finite-range, purely repulsive potentials, comprised of weakly compressed spheres at zero temperature and (ii) a system with the same network of contacts, but where the force between any particles in contact (and therefore the total pressure) is set to zero. We account in the two cases for the observed (a) convergence of D(omega) toward a nonzero constant as omega-->0, (b) appearance of a low-frequency cutoff omega*, and (c) power-law increase of omega* with compression. Differences between these two systems occur at a lower frequency. The density of states of the modified system displays an abrupt plateau that appears at omega*, below which we expect the system to behave as a normal, continuous, elastic body. In the unmodified system, the pressure lowers the frequency of the modes in excess. The requirement of stability despite the destabilizing effect of pressure yields a lower bound on the number of extra contact per particle deltaz:deltaz> or =p1/2, which generalizes the Maxwell criterion for rigidity when pressure is present. This scaling behavior is observed in the simulations. We finally discuss how the cooling procedure can affect the microscopic structure and the density of normal modes.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, AI for Physical Sciences

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Pierfrancesco Urbani
  2. Salvatore Torquato
  3. Giorgio Parisi
  4. Silvio Franz
  5. Francesco Zamponi
  6. Hernán A. Makse
  7. Flaviano Morone
  8. Hans Jürgen Herrmann

In Condensed Matter Physics

  1. Giorgio Parisi
  2. Pierfrancesco Urbani
  3. Francesco Zamponi
  4. Silvio Franz
  5. Salvatore Torquato
  6. Flaviano Morone
  7. Hernán A. Makse
  8. Adrian Baule

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Giorgio Parisi
  2. Francesco Zamponi
  3. Pierfrancesco Urbani
  4. Silvio Franz
  5. Salvatore Torquato
  6. Hans Jürgen Herrmann
  7. Adrian Baule
  8. Flaviano Morone

In AI for Physical Sciences

  1. Pierfrancesco Urbani
  2. Francesco Zamponi
  3. Giorgio Parisi
  4. Silvio Franz
  5. Matthieu Wyart
  6. Stefano Spigler
  7. Mario Geiger
  8. Hans Jürgen Herrmann

Citations in the corpus