Nonlinear optical susceptibilities, Raman efficiencies, and electro-optic tensors from first-principles density functional perturbation theory
By M. Veithen, Xavier Gonze, Philippe Ghosez. 2004
244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The nonlinear response of infinite periodic solids to homogenous electric fields and collective atomic displacements is discussed in the framework of density functional perturbation theory. The approach is based on the 2n+1 theorem applied to an electric-field-dependent energy functional. We report the expressions for the calculation of the nonlinear optical susceptibilities, Raman scattering efficiencies, and electro-optic (EO) coefficients. Different formulations of third-order energy derivatives are examined and their convergence with respect to the k-point sampling is discussed. We apply our method to a few simple cases and compare our results to those obtained with distinct techniques. Finally, we discuss the effect of a scissors correction on the EO coefficients and nonlinear optical susceptibilities.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e21ba76a753373b057c6675732afbfa9d0a76b60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- D. van Thourhout
- R. Baets
- Abdul Rahim
- Despoina Petousi
- Bart Kuyken
- Artur Hermans
- Benjamin Wohlfeil
- Wim Bogaerts
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- D. van Thourhout
- R. Baets
- Abdul Rahim
- Despoina Petousi
- Bart Kuyken
- Artur Hermans
- Benjamin Wohlfeil
- Wim Bogaerts
Citations in the corpus
- Taking silicon photonics modulators to a higher performance level: state-of-the-art and a review of new technologies (2021, background): “coefficients in these ferroelectrics tends to come from lattice vibrations rather than electron movements.(234,235) Because of”