Chemotactic response of plant-growth-promoting bacteria towards roots of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal tomato plants.

By S. Sood. 2003

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. (2004, background): “…1986; Norman & Hooker, 2000), increase attraction of the plant-growthpromoting bacteria, Azotobacter chroococcum and Pseudomonas fluorescens (Sood, 2003), effect protozoan activities (Wamberg et al., 2003) and alter microbial composition in the rhizosphere (Meyer & Linderman, 1986;…”
Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development (2013, background): “Interestingly, PGPRs and endophytic bacteria show chemotaxis towards glycine (Gaworzewska and Carlile, 1982; de Weert et al., 2002; Gupta Sood, 2003), while the non-symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria Azotobacter vinelandii shows chemotactic behavior towards xylitol (Haneline et al., 1991).”
The Biocontrol Effect of Mycorrhization on Soilborne Fungal Pathogens and the Autoregulation of the AM Symbiosis: One Mechanism, Two Effects? (2008, background): “Looking at the chemotactic response root exudates collected from non-mycorrhizal tomato roots exhibited a higher attracting effect on zoospores of P. parasitica (Lioussanne et al. 2003), whereas in the case of the two plant-growthpromoting bacteria A. chroococum and P. fluorescens, root exudates fro”