Intercultural Information Ethics

By K. Himma, H. Tavani. 2008

61 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Iason Gabriel
2. Irene Solaiman
3. Margaret Mitchell
4. Sara Hooker
5. Muntasir Wahed
6. N. Ahmed

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

1. Alexandra Sasha Luccioni
2. Iason Gabriel
3. Irene Solaiman
4. Marie-Therese Png
5. Vafa Ghazavi
6. Zeerak Talat
7. Yacine Jernite
8. Su Lin Blodgett

In Philosophy

1. Iason Gabriel
2. Irene Solaiman
3. Marie-Therese Png
4. Zeerak Talat
5. Yacine Jernite
6. Sara Hooker

Citations in the corpus

• Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society (2023, background): “Intercultural dialogues [48] that meaningfully address power imbalances and lowering the barrier for underrepresented peoples to contribute can improve harms from resource gaps.”
• The Challenge of Value Alignment: from Fairer Algorithms to AI Safety (2021, background): “…not overshadow the 8 The challenge of ensuring different voices are properly heard has parallels in information ethics, which draws a distinction between a ‘mono-cultural view of ethics’ that claims exclusive validity, and a ‘transcultural ethics’ arising from intercultural dialogue (Capurro 2007).”