Harvest control in open-access sport fisheries: Hot rod or asleep at the reel?

By S. Cox, T. Beard, Carl J Walters. 2002

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Recreational Fisheries: Socioeconomic Importance, Conservation Issues and Management Challenges (2009, background): “There are instances where harvest Barney_C003.indd 51 11/18/2008 12:30:13 PM controls alone have been ineffective in sustaining recreational fi shing, resulting in calls to limit entry (and thus directly control effort) (Cox et al., 2002).”
Dynamic angling effort influences the value of minimum‐length limits to prevent recruitment overfishing (2013, background): “For angler populations mainly interested in keeping fish for harvest, the expected harvest at a site and the possibility to keep fish should strongly determine site choice and drive angling effort dynamics (Cox et al. 2002; Beard et al. 2003; Johnston et al. 2010).”
Stock assessment in inland fisheries: a foundation for sustainable use and conservation (2016, background): “…and Welcomme 2004); impacts of stocking hatchery fish into natural populations (Lorenzen 2005); and the regulation of fisheries with large catch-and release components (Cox et al. 2002; Coggins et al. 2007; Dotson et al. 2013); or the control of invasive fish species (Brown and Walker 2004) .”