Information Avoidance: Who, What, When, and Why
By Kate Sweeny, Darya Melnyk, Wendi A. Miller, J. Shepperd. 2010
618 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1ac7fc667875b80f87cb041089851ce0fc8a95a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Betty Chang
- Yael Benn
- Thomas Llewelyn Webb
- Peter M. Gollwitzer
- P. Sheeran
- G. Oettingen
- Phillippa Lally
- Benjamin Gardner
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Betty Chang
- Yael Benn
- Thomas Llewelyn Webb
- Peter M. Gollwitzer
- P. Sheeran
- Kathleen D. Vohs
- Roy F. Baumeister
- Marylène Gagné
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- ‘The Ostrich Problem’: motivated avoidance or rejection of information about goal progress (2013, background): “, 1995), or self-beliefs (Holton & Pyszczynski, 1989); (ii) may demand undesired action (Sweeny et al., 2010); (iii) suggests that goal progress is poor rather than good (e.”
- The Demand for, and Avoidance of, Information (2015, neutral): “…and even when the results of the test could provide valuable information for decision making (e.g., whether to obtain treatment) (Lyter et al., 1987; Lerman et al., 1996; Lerman et al., 1999; Caplin and Eliaz, 2003; Köszegi, 2003; Thornton, 2008; Oster et al., 2013; see also Sweeny et al., 2010).”
- What motivates Chinese consumers to avoid information about the COVID-19 pandemic?: The perspective of the stimulus-organism-response model (2020, neutral): “In terms of convergent validity, the values of average variance extracted (AVE) were all above 0.5 (Chin, 1998), and all the item loadings were larger than the required 0.7, indicating that convergent validity is satisfied. Discriminant validity was examined with three methods, following Ko (2018). ”