Prospect theory, discrete emotions, and freedom threats: An extension of psychological reactance theory

By Brian L. Quick, Jennifer A. Kam, Susan E. Morgan, Claudia A. Montero Liberona, Rebecca A. Smith. 2015

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e19fb8038e4573c13366c81efafaad286fb0f773

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Tobias Reynolds-Tylus
2. Robin L. Nabi
3. Abel Gustafson
4. Alice E. Hall

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Tobias Reynolds-Tylus
2. Robin L. Nabi
3. Abel Gustafson
4. Alice E. Hall

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Abel Gustafson
2. R. Jensen
3. Tobias Reynolds-Tylus
4. Robin L. Nabi
5. Alice E. Hall
6. L. Aarøe

Citations in the corpus

• Framing Climate Change: Exploring the Role of Emotion in Generating Advocacy Behavior (2018, background): “…are less effective than their gain-framed counterparts because loss-and threat-framed messages are more likely to lead to psychological reactance (e.g., Cho & Sands, 2011; Quick, Kam, Morgan, Montero Liberona, & Smith, 2015) and contradict fundamental just-world beliefs (Feinberg & Willer, 2011).”
• Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Review of the Literature (2019, methodology): “…for assessing negative cognitions is of course, economy of measurement, and the flexibility to implement these measures outside the laboratory (Quick et al., 2015), in more longitudinal studies (Gardner and Leshner, 2016), and among non-college student populations (Varava and Quick, 2015).”