Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies.

By A. Clarke, K. Armstrong, Amy E. Carmichael, J. Milne, S. Raghu, G. Roderick, David K. Yeates. Annual Review of Entomology, 2005

651 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of tropical fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) contains 75 described species, largely endemic to Southeast Asia. Within the complex are a small number of polyphagous pests of international significance, including B. dorsalis sensu stricto, B. papayae, B. carambolae, and B. philippinensis. Most species within the complex were described in 1994 and since then substantial research has been undertaken in developing morphological and molecular diagnostic techniques for their recognition. Such techniques can now resolve most taxa adequately. Genetic evidence suggests that the complex has evolved in only the last few million years, and development of a phylogeny of the group is considered a high priority to provide a framework for future evolutionary and ecological studies. As model systems, mating studies on B. dorsalis s.s. and B. cacuminata have substantially advanced our understanding of insect use of plant-derived chemicals for mating, but such studies have not been applied to help resolve the limits of biological species within the complex. Although they are commonly regarded as major pests, there is little published evidence documenting economic losses caused by flies of the B. dorsalis complex. Quantification of economic losses caused by B. dorsalis complex species is urgently needed to prioritize research for quarantine and management. Although they have been documented as invaders, relatively little work has been done on the invasion biology of the complex and this is an area warranting further work.

Subfields: Ecology, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e19a1c46cbadc2bf85f460a009829a078037c7e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Laura Boykin
  2. K. Armstrong
  3. S. Cameron
  4. T. Shelly

In Insect Science

  1. T. Shelly
  2. Phillip W Taylor
  3. C. Weldon
  4. Laura Boykin
  5. S. Cameron
  6. Sunday Ekesi
  7. B. Yuval

Citations in the corpus