Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica) (Serrahn, North-east Germany)

By G. Oheimb, Christina Westphal, Holger Tempel, W. Härdtle. 2005

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives (2015, background): “…pattern regularity can be defined as: (1) regular; (2) random (Poisson); and (3) clumped (aggregated) in varying degrees, depending, in natural forests, on site, species composition, sampling scale, and stand age (Szwagrzyk and Czerwczak 1993; Hanewinkel 2004; von Oheimb et al. 2005; Paluch 2007).”
Is the reverse J-shaped diameter distribution universally applicable in European virgin beech forests? (2006, methodology): “It has also been used for the historical analysis of near-natural forests with a long time-span of non-intervention (Emborg et al., 1996; Jeschke, 1997; Pontailler et al., 1997; Oheimb et al., 2005).”
Developmental phases in a temperate natural spruce-fir-beech forest: determination by a supervised classification method (2010, methodology): “This method may be applied to any stem position data set that includes both living and dead trees (e.g. studies by Vrška et al. 2001a, b; Commarmot et al. 2005; von Oheimb et al. 2005; Emborg and Heilmann-Clausen 2007), allowing comparisons of different approaches for stand dynamics assessments.”