Lexical Functional Grammar A Formal System for Grammatical Representation
By Ronald M. Kaplan. 2004
319 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e17117dbee804d7d177d8eb9fadf0bda1ebc4d22
Citations in the corpus
- The Configurational Matrix (2002, unknown): “Our proposals are closer to unification-based approaches such as Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG; Kaplan and Bresnan 1982, Bresnan 2000), Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (GPSG; Gazdar et al. 1985), and Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG; Pollard and Sag 1987, 1994).”
- Computational Linguistics: 16th International Conference of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics, PACLING 2019, Hanoi, Vietnam, October 11–13, 2019, Revised Selected Papers (2019, unknown): “Such theories include LFG – Lexical Functional Grammar (Kaplan and Bresnan 1982; Dalrymple et al. 1995), HPSG – Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (Pollard and Sag 1987, 1994), TAG – Tree-Adjoining Grammar (Joshi 1987) and CG – Categorial Grammar (Haddock, Klein and Morill 1987; Steedman 2000).”
- The logic of syntactic priming and acceptability judgments (2016, unknown): “Some theories assume grammatical functions play a central role (e.g., Lexical-Functional Grammar [LFG]; Kaplan and Bresnan 1982), whereas others do not.”
- Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis (2012, unknown): “The importance of this fundamental design property has been discussed by many over the years , including Kaplan and Bresnan 1982 , Sag et al .”