FAST TRACK PAPER: Full three-dimensional tomography: a comparison between the scattering-integral and adjoint-wavefield methods

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics (2009, methodology): “Althoughthematrix-freeadjointapproachiswidely used in exploration seismology, the earthquake-seismology community tends tofavorthescattering-integralmethod,whichisbasedontheexplic-itbuildingofthesensitivitymatrix (cid:1) Chen et al., 2007 (cid:2) .”
Theoretical background for continental‐ and global‐scale full‐waveform inversion in the time–frequency domain (2008, methodology): “An alternative to the adjoint method is the scattering-integral method (Chen et al. 2007b), which can be more efficient when the number of sources is much larger than the number of receivers.”
Full 3D Tomography for the Crustal Structure of the Los Angeles Region (2007, methodology): “Compared with an alternative implementation of full 3D tomography based on the adjoint-wave-field method (Ackelik et al., 2003; Tromp et al., 2005; Liu and Tromp, 2006), the SI method has several advantages (Chen et al., 2007).”
Seismic imaging: From classical to adjoint tomography (2012, methodology): “…to interest in calculating finite-frequency sensitivity kernels based on more accurate forward modeling methods (Boschi et al., 2007; Liu and Tromp, 2006, 2008; Zhao et al., 2005), and its ensuing applications to tomographic problems (Chen et al., 2007a; Fichtner et al., 2009b; Tape et al., 2010).”