Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps

By Stefan Dercon, L. Christiaensen. 2007

1,053 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Much has been written on the determinants of input and technology adoption in agriculture, with issues such as input availability, knowledge and education, risk preferences, profitability, and credit constraints receiving much attention. This paper focuses on a factor that has been less well documented: the differential ability of households to take on risky production technologies for fear of the welfare consequences if shocks result in poor harvests. Building on an explicit model, this is explored in panel data for Ethiopia. Historical rainfall distributions are used to identify the counterfactual consumption risk. Controlling for unobserved household and time-varying village characteristics, it emerges that not just exante credit constraints, but also the possibly low consumption outcomes when harvests fail, discourage the application of fertiliser. The lack of insurance causes inefficiency in production choices.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e16538328b9443f9e5fe48482b63ee6869fe83d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Christopher B. Barrett
  2. Michael R. Carter
  3. Ruth Vargas Hill
  4. Stefan Dercon
  5. A. de Janvry
  6. L. Christiaensen
  7. E. Sadoulet
  8. James Hansen

In Safety Research

  1. Christopher B. Barrett
  2. Michael R. Carter
  3. Ruth Vargas Hill
  4. Stefan Dercon
  5. L. Christiaensen
  6. M. Kassie
  7. Salvatore Di Falco
  8. Valerie Mueller

In Soil Science

  1. Christopher B. Barrett
  2. Michael R. Carter
  3. M. Kassie
  4. Ruth Vargas Hill
  5. Stefan Dercon
  6. L. Christiaensen
  7. Salvatore Di Falco
  8. Leslie Lipper

Citations in the corpus