Awe’s effects on generosity and helping

By Claire Prade, V. Saroglou. 2016

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e162966931b07ce2f384f97f9e1ef5271c2530a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Andrea Gaggioli
2. Jonathan Haidt
3. Alice Chirico
4. Dacher Keltner
5. V. Glăveanu
6. Scott Barry Kaufman
7. David B. Yaden

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Alice Chirico
2. Dacher Keltner
3. David B. Yaden
4. Andrea Gaggioli
5. Jia Wei Zhang
6. Jonathan Haidt
7. Giuseppe Riva
8. Pietro Cipresso

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Dacher Keltner
2. Jonathan Haidt
3. Alice Chirico
4. David B. Yaden
5. Andrea Gaggioli
6. R. Hood
7. Giuseppe Riva
8. Jia Wei Zhang

Citations in the corpus

• The development of the Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): A multifactorial measure for a complex emotion (2018, background): “Awe has been shown to influence one’s attention (Prade & Saroglou, 2016; Sung & Yih, 2016) in a way that tends to be consistent with Fredrickson’s Broaden and Build theory of positive emotions (Fredrickson, 2001).”
• Awe Enhances Creative Thinking: An Experimental Study (2018, background): “The neutral video showed hens wandering in the grass, and it was used a contrast condition in line with previous studies (e.g., Griskevicius et al., 2010; Prade & Saroglou, 2016).”
• The Varieties of Self-Transcendent Experience (2017, background): “Other induction methods include reading or writing about experiences of awe (Shiota, Keltner, & Mossman, 2007, listening to music, or viewing awe-inspiring images (Prade & Saroglou, 2016).”