Biomass Energy and Competition for Land

By J. Reilly, S. Paltsev. GTAP Working Paper, 2008

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

*Chapter 8 of the forthcoming book "Economic Analysis of Land Use in Global Climate Change Policy," edited by Thomas W. Hertel, Steven Rose, and Richard S.J. Tol We describe an approach for incorporating biomass energy production and competition for land into the MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model, a computable general equilibrium model of the world economy. We examine multiple scenarios where greenhouse gas emissions are abated or not. The global increase in biomass energy use in a reference scenario (without climate change policy) is about 30 EJ/year by 2050 and about 180 EJ/year by 2100. This deployment is driven primarily by a world oil price that in the year 2100 is over 4.5 times the price in the year 2000. In the scenarios of stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations, the global biomass energy production increases to 50-150 EJ/year by 2050 and 220-250 EJ/year by 2100. The estimated area of land required to produce 180-250 EJ/year is about 1 Gha, which is an equivalent of the current global cultivated area. In the USA we find that under a stringent climate policy biofuels could supply about 55% of USA liquid fuel demand, but if the biofuels were produced domestically the USA would turn from a substantial net exporter of agricultural goods ($20 billion) to a large net importer ($80 billion). The general conclusion is that the scale of energy use in the USA and the world relative to biomass potential is so large that a biofuel industry that was supplying a substantial share of liquid fuel demand would have very significant effects on land use and conventional agricultural markets.

Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1562b0c6816b9906846518d3543625a49cc1be7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Agronomy and Crop Science

  1. Sonja Peterson
  2. B. Kretschmer
  3. Jayson Beckman
  4. Thomas W. Hertel
  5. Betina Dimaranan Ifpri
  6. David Laborde Ifpri
  7. Biofuels Mandate
  8. John P. Weyant

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Sonja Peterson
  2. B. Kretschmer
  3. Jayson Beckman
  4. Thomas W. Hertel
  5. W. Tyner
  6. Betina Dimaranan Ifpri
  7. David Laborde Ifpri
  8. Biofuels Mandate

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

  1. Sonja Peterson
  2. B. Kretschmer
  3. Jayson Beckman
  4. Thomas W. Hertel
  5. W. Tyner
  6. Betina Dimaranan Ifpri
  7. David Laborde Ifpri
  8. Biofuels Mandate

Citations in the corpus