A survey on concept drift adaptation
By João Gama, Indrė Žliobaitė, Albert Bifet, Mykola Pechenizkiy, Abdelhamid Bouchachia. 2014
3,760 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Information Systems
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- De-chuan Zhan
- Han-Jia Ye
- Sergey Levine
- Wojciech Samek
- K. Müller
- Yoshua Bengio
- Grgoire Montavon
- Chelsea Finn
In Biomedical Engineering
- James Harrison
- Chelsea Finn
- Annie Xie
- Reuben Binns
- Michael Veale
- Heitor Murilo Gomes
- K. Müller
- Neil D. Lawrence
In Information Systems
- Bernhard Pfahringer
- Albert Bifet
- G. Holmes
- Jesse Read
- Bart Goethals
- Zhi-Hua Zhou
- Chelsea Finn
- James Harrison
Citations in the corpus
- Recent Advances of Continual Learning in Computer Vision: An Overview (2021, neutral): “Secondly, when learning from new data of the same category in sequential order, this can also lead to the problem of concept drift [3, 4, 5], as the new data may change the data distribution of this category in unforeseen ways [6].”
- Incremental Learning in Online Scenario (2020, background): “In addition to address catastrophic forgetting [16] as in offline incremental learning, we also need to consider concept drift [5] in online scenario.”
- Online Fast Adaptation and Knowledge Accumulation: a New Approach to Continual Learning (2020, background): “This is known task revisiting as recurrent concept drift (Gama et al., 2014).”
- Increasing Trust in AI Services through Supplier's Declarations of Conformity (2018, background): “A well-known reason for performance degradation, it is a common cause of frustration and loss of trust for AI service consumers that can be detected and corrected using a multitude of methods [34].”
- Continuous Meta-Learning without Tasks (2019, background): “These baselines are a competitive approach to learning in time-varying data streams [13] and have been applied meta-learning in time-varying settings [31].”
- Machine learning and deep learning (2021, background): “Further, the validity of recommendations based on data is prone to concept drift, which describes a scenario, where “ the relation between the input data and the target variable changes over time ” (Gama et al. 2014).”
- Online Deep Learning: Learning Deep Neural Networks on the Fly (2017, background): “…learn and adapt as and when it sees more data, enabling a form of life-long learning (Lee et al. 2016); (vi) In concept drifting scenarios (Gama et al. 2014), traditional online backpropagation would suffer from slow convergence for deep networks (when the concepts would change), whereas,…”
- Learning With Feature Evolvable Streams (2017, background): “We want to emphasize that though concept-drift happens in streaming data where the underlying data distribution changes over time [17], [18], [19], the number of features in concept-drift never changes which is different from our problem.”
- FAHT: An Adaptive Fairness-aware Decision Tree Classifier (2019, background): “The main challenge for learning in a stream environment is the so called, concept-drifts, i.e., changes in the joint data distribution over time [Krawczyk et al. , 2017; Aggarwal, 2007; Gama et al. , 2014].”
- Adaptive Deep Models for Incremental Learning: Considering Capacity Scalability and Sustainability (2019, background): “That is, the joint distribution between the input feature and the ground truth will change as the concept drift [12].”
- Incremental on-line learning: A review and comparison of state of the art algorithms (2018, background): “Incremental learning is more frequently treated in the setting of streaming scenarios [17, 18], although most of the work particularly targets concept drift [19, 20, 6].”
- Understanding Continual Learning Settings with Data Distribution Drift Analysis (2021, background): “We also build upon the distribution shift literature, notably Kelly et al. (1999); ˇZliobait˙e (2010); Gama et al. (2014).”
- Learning with Feature and Distribution Evolvable Streams (2020, background): “Distribution change frequently appears in the streaming data and has drawn considerable research interest in recent years (Gama et al., 2014; Gomes et al., 2017).”
- Open challenges for data stream mining research (2014, background): “The challenge posed by drift has been subject to extensive research, thus we provide here solely a brief categorization and refer to recent surveys like [17].”
- Minimax Classification under Concept Drift with Multidimensional Adaptation and Performance Guarantees (2022, positive): “The statistical characteristics describing the underlying distribution of instance-label pairs often change with time in practical scenarios of supervised classification (Gama et al., 2014; Ditzler et al., 2015).”
- Social media big data analytics: A survey (2019, neutral): “However, e ffi cient techniques and analytical approaches to handle the ever-growing data generated by various social media applications are of paramount need (Gama, Ž liobait ė , Bifet, Pechenizkiy, & Bouchachia, 2014).”