Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn
By Rafael A. Massinga, R. Currie, M. Horak, J. Boyer. Weed science, 2001
255 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Plant Science, Pollution
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e14ae4239baad49f1760802f341bacf9c7c1cc17
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Plant Science
In Pollution
Citations in the corpus
- The Dioecious Amaranthus spp.: Here to Stay (2007, background): “Massinga et al. (2001) reported that corn grain yield was reduced 11 to 91% with Palmer amaranth densities of 0.5 to 9 plants/m2.”
- Residual Herbicides for Palmer Amaranth Control (2011, background): “) in Kansas reduced yield 13, 17, and 11% respectively (Klingaman and Oliver, 1994; Massinga et al., 2001; Morgan et al., 2001).”
- Effect of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) emergence date on growth and fecundity in soybean (2004, background): “Most studies investigating effects of delayed weed emergence on weed growth and competitiveness have not reported mortality rates associated with delayed emergence (Knezevic et al. 2001; Massinga et al. 2001; McLachlan et al. 1993).”
- Loss of Glyphosate Efficacy: A Changing Weed Spectrum in Georgia Cotton (2010, background): “Palmer amaranth causes significant yield loss in agronomic crops (Klingaman and Oliver 1994; Massinga et al. 2001; Moore et al. 2004; Morgan et al. 2001), with a relatively low population density of two GR Palmer amaranth plants per 5.6 m2 reducing cotton yields 23% (MacRae et al. 2008).”
- Interference of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Sweetpotato (2010, background): “Season-long Palmer amaranth densities from 0.5 to 8 plants m21 of row reduced corn yields 11 to 91% (Massinga et al. 2001).”
- Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri ) confirmed in Georgia (2006, background): “Palmer amaranth reduced corn (Zea mays L.) yields 11 to 91% with 0.5 to 8 plants m 1 of row (Massinga et al. 2001; Massinga and Currie 2002) and reduced soybean yield 17 to 68% with 0.33 to 10 plants m 1 of row (Klingaman and Oliver 1994).”