Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids

By C. Nufio, D. Papaj. 2001

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1493354ff885fd38c1ff0a0dc73ad1194a37106

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Hilker
2. T. Meiners
3. Zeyaur Khan
4. Samantha M. Cook
5. J. Pickett
6. P. Duyck
7. M. Dicke
8. A. Agrawal

In Genetics

1. P. David

In Insect Science

1. J. Pickett
2. Zeyaur Khan
3. M. Hilker
4. T. Meiners
5. Samantha M. Cook
6. C. Midega
7. Z. Tadele
8. M. Dicke

Citations in the corpus

• The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. (2007, background): “ODPs are another class of spacing pheromones that enable female insects to avoid laying eggs on previously exploited hosts, thereby reducing intraspecific competition (83, 102, 113, 146).”
• A review of relationships between interspecific competition and invasions in fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) (2004, background): “Most studies suggest that host-marking pheromones are only effective against individuals of the same species (Fitt, 1989; Nufio & Papaj, 2001), but it has also been demonstrated in the genus Rhagoletis that there may be some form of crossrecognition between species of a given group (Prokopy et al.,…”
• Induction of plant responses to oviposition and feeding by herbivorous arthropods: a comparison (2002, background): “The production of oviposition deterrents by plants with eggs might benefit the herbivore by prevention of competition (Nufio & Papaj, 2001), but may also be advantageous for the plant by avoidance of further egg depositions from which feeding larvae will hatch.”