The Evolving Universe

By Rebecca Whitaker Msfc. 2008

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1482b7a0ae09fee1e4ba182c4933322a5cf6e7f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Testing gravity with redshift-space distortions using the power spectrum multipoles (2013, background): “One interesting observable, which allows us to test GR on cosmic scales, is redshift space distortions (RSD; Sargent & Turner 1977; Kaiser 1987; Hamilton 1998).”
The clustering of the SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey DR14 quasar sample: measurement of the growth rate of structure from the anisotropic correlation function between redshift 0.8 and 2.2 (2018, methodology): “The linear theory formalism was first derived by Kaiser (1987) (see Hamilton 1998, for its development in configuration space); but its validity is limited to large scales (s > 80 h−1Mpc), since it does not account for non-linear evolution as density fluctuations grow at smaller scales.”
Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxies (2006, methodology): “In the small-angle (distant observer) approximation where all galaxy pairs subtend a small-angle relative to the line of sight, Pgg; Pgv; Pvv reduce to simple linear combinations of the monopole, quadrupole and hexadecapole power spectra in redshift space [182,183]:”
Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model (2014, unknown): “The line-of-sight component of peculiar velocities causes the observable redshift-space power spectrum P (s) gg (k, μk) to be ‘squashed’ along the line of sight on large scales (in the linear regime) and to produce pronounced ‘finger-of-God’ features on small scales (in the nonlinear regime) [973, 9”
The linear power spectrum of observed source number counts (2011, background): “[25] A. J. S. Hamilton, in The Evolving Universe, edited by D. Hamilton (1998), vol. 231 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library, pp. 185–+, astro-ph/9708102.”
THE CLUSTERING OF MASSIVE GALAXIES AT z ∼ 0.5 FROM THE FIRST SEMESTER OF BOSS DATA (2010, background): “The enhancement of clustering over the real-space result on large scales (Kaiser 1987, for a review see Hamilton 1998 and for recent developments see Pápai & Szapudi 2008; Shaw & Lewis 2008) is evident in the comparison of the data to the power-law.”
Cosmological Tests of Gravity (2010, background): “The line-of-sight component of peculiar velocities cause the observable redshiftspace power spectrum P (s) gg (k, μk) to be ‘squashed’ along the line of sight on large scales (in the linear regime) and to produce pronounced ‘finger-of-God’ features on small scales (in the nonlinear regime) [199, 200”
Simultaneous constraints on the growth of structure and cosmic expansion from the multipole power spectra of the SDSS DR7 LRG sample (2013, background): “The second effect is the redshift-space distortions (RSDs) caused by peculiar velocities of galaxies (e.g. Hamilton 1998b; Peebles 1980).”
A 2 per cent distance to $z$=0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations - I. Methods and application to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2012, background): “In the limit of linear theory (i.e. large scales), this term exactly removes redshift- space distortions (Kaiser 1987; Hamilton 1998; Scoccimarro 2004).”
On the Robustness of the Acoustic Scale in the Low-Redshift Clustering of Matter (2006, background): “In general, this integral is similar to the general redshift distortion problem (Hamilton 1998; Scoccimarro 2004; Matsubara et al. 2004) and does not have an easy solution.”