Demystifying GPT Self-Repair for Code Generation
By Theo X. Olausson, Jeevana Priya Inala, Chenglong Wang, Jianfeng Gao, Armando Solar-Lezama. 2023
81 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Hardware and Architecture, Software, Large Language Models, Code Generation & Program Synthesis
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Hardware and Architecture
In Software
- Armando Solar-Lezama
- Xinyun Chen
- Koushik Sen
- Naman Jain
- Tianjun Zhang
- Ion Stoica
- Quoc V. Le
- Adams Wei Yu
In Large Language Models
In Code Generation & Program Synthesis
Citations in the corpus
- LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code (2024, methodology): “The self-repair scenario is based on previous works that tested the self-repair capabilities of LLMs (Olausson et al., 2023; Shinn et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2023).”
- Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023, background): “…al., 2022; Ganguli et al., 2023), improving reasoning (Shinn et al., 2023; Madaan et al., 2023) and code generation performance (Chen et al., 2023e; Olausson et al., 2023; Shinn et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2023b), dialogue applications (Nair et al., 2023; Madaan et al., 2023; Yuan et al., 2023),…”
- Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration (2023, background): “(2) SPP is fairly robust to the prompt change and show good performance with only the first demo example.”
- Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet (2023, background): “In contrast, external feedback incorporates inputs from humans, other models (Wang et al., 2023; Paul et al., 2023, inter alia ), or external tools and knowledge sources (Gou et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2023b; Olausson et al., 2023; Gao et al., 2023, inter alia ).”