Effects of parasitoid fecundity and host resistance on indirect interactions among hosts sharing a parasitoid

By G. Heimpel, C. Neuhauser, M. Hoogendoorn. 2003

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Banker Plant Method in Biological Control (2011, background): “Another drawback may be that the target pest species benefits from the presence of a marginal host on banker plants because it acts as a sink source (Heimpel et al., 2003).”
Associational Resistance and Associational Susceptibility: Having Right or Wrong Neighbors (2009, background): “Other mechanisms leading to AR or AS are highlighted by Shiojiri et al. (2001) and Heimpel et al. (2003), although their research did not specifically focus on AR or AS.”
Up or down in space? Uniting the bottom-up versus top-down paradigm and spatial ecology (2007, background): “…to feeding damage by one species and thereby changes the potential for later species to battle parasitism (Haukioja 2005), or when species interact with each others through shared predators and parasites (Müller and Godfray 1997, Heimpel et al. 2003, Morris et al. 2004, van Veen et al. 2006).”
Indirect effects between shared prey: Predictions for (2004, background): “Likewise, parasitoids can have lower reproduction because of hosts that act as egg sinks (Heimpel et al., 2003).”