Regional Convergence: Evidence from a New State-by-State Capital Stock Series

By Gasper A. Garofalo, Steven Yamarik. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Complementarity between Cities and Skills (2009, unknown): “A few heroic social scientists, such as Munnell (1991) and Garofalo and Yamarik (2002) have created state-level estimates of the capital stock, but these estimates have been based on apportioning the national capital stock to states on the basis of the types of industries in those states.10 At the…”
Corruption is bad for growth (even in the United States) (2011, methodology): “Real investment and capital stock data are from Garofalo and Yamarik (2002).”
Panel evidence on economic freedom and growth in the United States (2011, background): “Additional controls include initial real per-capita gross state product (from the BEA) and investment (measured as gross private investment in thousands per capita) from Garofalo and Yamarik (2002).”
Spatial Econometric Modeling of Regional Convergence in Continuous Time (2003, background): “Economic growth theories have been popular for a long time in the macroeconomic literature, starting from Solow’s neoclassical growth model (Solow 1956; see also Abramovitz 1986; Barro and Sala-i-Martin 1992; Evans and Karras 1996; Garofalo and Yamarik 2002).”
The Robust Relationship between Taxes and U.S. State Income Growth (2008, unknown): “(cf. Garofalo and Yamarik, 2002).”