Offender profiling and criminal differentiation
By David Canter. 2000
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0ff4fb6102bf20456c7c4d99f3570580f81c06b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- P. Taylor
- David Canter
- N. Wentink
- C. Gabrielle Salfati
- C. Bennell
- Laurence Alison
- Natalie J. Jones
- A. Mokros
In Statistics and Probability
- N. Wentink
- C. Bennell
- C. Gabrielle Salfati
- Laurence Alison
- P. Taylor
- Natalie J. Jones
- Emily K. Alison
Citations in the corpus
- An Empirical Test of Holmes and Holmes’s Serial Murder Typology (2004, background): “The contours of frequency have also been found in a number of other studies of criminal actions, indicating a lawful consistency to this empirical finding (Canter, 2000; Canter & Fritzon, 1998; Canter & Heritage, 1990).”
- Between a ROC and a hard place: a method for linking serial burglaries by modus operandi (2005, background): “Second, as Canter and Youngs (2003) have argued, it will be important in the future for researchers in this area to identify the most salient features of a crime, taking into account the overall frequency with which various behaviours are exhibited by offenders.”
- Behavioural crime linking in serial homicide (2008, unknown): “Further, Canter (2000) points out the importance of using multiple indicators of a single behavioural dimension to minimize the impact of situational variables, rather than analysing specific offence features separately.”
- The Organized/Disorganized Typology of Serial Murder: Myth or Model? (2004, background): “This relates well to the process that Canter (2000) describes as treating the victim as a “person.””
- THE PERSONALITY PARADOX IN OFFENDER PROFILING A Theoretical Review of the Processes Involved in Deriving Background Characteristics From Crime Scene Actions (2002, background): “regarding levels of differentiation in offending behavior (Canter, 2000).”
- Differentiating sexual violence: A comparison of sexual homicide and rape (2006, background): “The current intra-domain model, therefore, represents a very real example of a methodology that allows research to move across the hierarchical boundaries of criminological investigation (Canter, 2000).”
- Pragmatic solutions to offender profiling and behavioural investigative advice (2010, unknown): “The pioneering work of Canter (1995, 2000) and his colleagues aimed to employ an explicit, psychological (i.e. scientific) framework to provide offender characteristics that are directly useful (i.e. avoiding non-falsifiable and non-pragmatic motivational and/or psychodynamic explanations) to…”