Modeled climate change effects on distributions of Canadian butterfly species

By A. Townsend Peterson, E. Martínez‐Meyer, C. González‐Salazar, P. W. Hall. 2004

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0e9e35834d5cb049bf59015b521259ed336b43e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The View from the Cape: Extinction Risk, Protected Areas, and Climate Change (2005, background): “…Ferreira de Siqueira et al. 2003 Amazonia Trees 69 Miles et al. 2004 Australia Vertebrates, insects 65 Williams et al. 2003 Canada Butterflies 111 Peterson et al. 2004 United States Trees 80 Iverson and Prasad 1998 Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/BioScience on 04 Aug 2020 Terms of…”
Assessing the vulnerability of European butterflies to climate change using multiple criteria (2010, methodology): “Colias myrmidone and Scolitantides bavius) whose current occurrences are located in agriculturally dominated landscapes may be amongst the most vulnerable species, and have few possibilities to move to the new climatically suitable areas (cf. Erasmus et al. 2002; Peterson et al. 2004).”
Contrasted impacts of climate change on stream fish assemblages along an environmental gradient (2009, background): “…from a variety of major taxonomic groups, including plants (e.g. Saetersdal et al. , 1998; Thuiller, 2004; Ohlemu ¨ ller et al. , 2006), insects (e.g. Peterson et al. , 2004), mammals (e.g. Thuiller et al. , 2006a; Levinsky et al. , 2007), herptiles (e.g. Araujo et al. , 2006) and birds (e.g.…”
Escape from natural enemies during climate‐driven range expansion: a case study (2008, background): “A frequent approach for predicting the consequences of these changes for biodiversity is to project range changes into the future using bioclimate/distribution/niche models (e.g. Peterson et al. , 2004; Thomas et al. , 2004 ).”
Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models (2006, background): “These projections, under assumptions made fairly explicit, provide hypotheses of species’ potential geographic distributions and how they will change over the next few decades of evolving world climates, and this field has now seen extensive activity (Araújo et al. 2005a; Araújo et al. 2006; Berry e”