Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale

By C. Luchini, Brendon Stubbs, M. Solmi, N. Veronese. 2017

895 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Subfields: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Statistics and Probability, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0e9528ee24fee5e19bc143948f98536dc98d199

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. F. Bibeau
2. C. Luchini
3. M. Ligtenberg
4. Naveena Singh
5. A. Nottegar
6. T. Bosse
7. R. Miller
8. J. Douillard

Citations in the corpus

• ESMO recommendations on microsatellite instability testing for immunotherapy in cancer, and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden: a systematic review-based approach. (2019, methodology): “The median value of NOS score was 8.05 (NOS score: maximum¼9, risk of bias if<6; evaluation study by study not shown), indicating a high quality of studies with a very low risk of bias.”