Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications
By F. Valladares, David Sánchez-Gómez, M. A. Zavala. 2006
926 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0e870aa65e5de3d2bbe45d6717f8901e079ce95
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Molecular Biology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity. (2007, background): “It is clear that the concept of phenotypic plasticity has become an important part of modern evolutionary and ecological research (Pigliucci & Kaplan, 2006; Valladares et al., 2006), and it is now recognized as central to evolution rather than a minor phenomenon, as was the case not very long ago (S”
- Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment (2008, methodology): “To compare the degree of plasticity among species and traits, I generated a plasticity index (PIV) for each trait (Valladares et al. 2006).”
- Studying phenotypic plasticity: the advantages of a broad approach (2012, background): “When this methodological requirement is relaxed, populations and species can be used as experimental subjects of research on phenotypic plasticity (Valladares et al., 2006).”
- Ecological and evolutionary responses of Mediterranean plants to global change. (2014, positive): “…morphological and physiological adjustments that can enhance survival and persistence in those novel environments, and therefore, phenotypic plasticity is a major mode of adaptation in plants (Sultan, 1995, 2000, 2003; Pigliucci, 2001; Valladares et al., 2006; Ghalambor et al., 2007).”
- Stress, corticosterone responses and avian personalities (2007, methodology): “There are various approaches to the quantification of phenotypic plasticity, with the most widely used being the slope of a reaction norm (Valladares et al. 2006).”
- Leaf attributes and tree growth in a tropical dry forest (2011, background): “the steeper the slope, the greater the plasticity (Valladares et al. 2006).”
- Phenotypic plasticity in response to light in the coffee tree (2009, neutral): “environmental plots) of each trait (Valladares et al., 2006).”
- Conservation genetics in a globally changing environment: present problems, paradoxes and future challenges (2007, background): “Lastly it can also expose the populations to the risk of reduced Wtness due to outbreeding depression (Marr et al. 2002; Vergeer et al. 2004; Sagvik et al. 2005).”
- Plant Phenotypic Plasticity in Response to Environmental Factors (2014, background): “Most of them cannot be standardized across traits or compared among different species [78] complicating comparison among studies [3, 79].”
- The effects of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation on forecasts of species range shifts under climate change. (2014, background): “Plasticity is conventionally assessed by describing the response (reaction norm or dose–response curve) of a given genotype under different environmental conditions (Valladares et al. 2006).”
- Phenotypic plasticity blurs ecotypic divergence in the response of Quercus coccifera and Pinus halepensis to water stress (2008, methodology): “The relative distance plasticity index (RDPI, Valladares et al. 2006 ), ranging from 0 to 1, was calculated for each trait, species and population as RDPI = (dij ! ij)/(xij +x ij)/n where n is the total number of distances and j and j are two individuals of the same species belonging to diVerent tr”