Perpetration-Induced Traumatic Stress
By R. MacNair. 2002
150 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This volume introduces the concept of Perpetration-Induced Traumatic Stress (PITS), a form of PTSD symptoms caused not by traditionally expected roles, such as being a victim or rescuer in trauma, but by being an active participant in causing trauma. Sufferers of PITS may be in the roles of soldiers, executioners, or police officers, where it is socially acceptable or even expected for them to cause trauma, including death. Scattered evidence of PITS is consolidated, its implications are explored, and exciting potentials for future research are suggested. Compared to the more widely understood PTSD, there appears to be greater severity and different symptom patterns for those affected by PITS. Obvious differences to be explored for those who kill include questions of context, guilt, meaning, content of dreams, and sociological questions, leading to special implications for therapy, research into the causality of PTSD, and violence prevention efforts. Disciplines including sociology, public policy, history, philosophy, and theology will also find applications for this groundbreaking material.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0d62cf2e863e8d360b63d6d566b16268dab3319
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Advances in Continuous Traumatic Stress Theory: Traumatogenic Dynamics and Consequences of Intergroup Conflict: The Palestinian Adolescents Case (2013, background): “Perpetrating is a dependent stressor that may be a stress generator as well (e.g., McNair, 2002; Hecker et al., 2013).”
- An Exploration of the Viability and Usefulness of the Construct of Moral Injury in War Veterans (2011, background): “Although MacNair (2005) argued for a new diagnostic entity related to trauma perpetration, this is neither our intention, nor the focus of this research.”