Visual Working Memory Capacity: From Psychophysics and Neurobiology to Individual Differences

By Steven J. Luck, Edward K. Vogel. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2013

994 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Visual working memory capacity is of great interest because it is strongly correlated with overall cognitive ability, can be understood at the level of neural circuits, and is easily measured. Recent studies have shown that capacity influences tasks ranging from saccade targeting to analogical reasoning. A debate has arisen over whether capacity is constrained by a limited number of discrete representations or by an infinitely divisible resource, but the empirical evidence and neural network models currently favor a discrete item limit. Capacity differs markedly across individuals and groups, and recent research indicates that some of these differences reflect true differences in storage capacity whereas others reflect variations in the ability to use memory capacity efficiently.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0a0657991b8305bc41a15bfc76e7e94a47b4b21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sergey Levine
  2. Matthew Botvinick
  3. Bradley R. Postle
  4. Mark D'Esposito
  5. Hsuan-Yu Lin
  6. Demis Hassabis
  7. Joel Z. Leibo
  8. Pieter Abbeel

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Bradley R. Postle
  2. Mark D'Esposito
  3. Matthew Botvinick
  4. Klaus Oberauer
  5. Demis Hassabis
  6. John-Dylan Haynes
  7. Hsuan-Yu Lin
  8. Pieter R. Roelfsema

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Bradley R. Postle
  2. Mark D'Esposito
  3. Hsuan-Yu Lin
  4. Pieter R. Roelfsema
  5. John-Dylan Haynes
  6. D. Melcher
  7. E. Balestrieri
  8. Klaus Oberauer

Citations in the corpus