Genetic rescue benefits persist to at least the F3 generation, based on a meta-analysis

By R. Frankham. 2016

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e09c7b2d3f7e8a927371213aca0398fdfde3fbc4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. R. Frankham
2. R. Lacy
3. P. Hedrick
4. J. Ballou
5. C. Fenster
6. K. Ralls
7. P. Sunnucks
8. J. Vucetich

In Plant Science

1. C. Fenster
2. P. Hedrick
3. R. Frankham
4. P. Meirmans
5. David J. Winter
6. S. Martén-Rodríguez
7. Andrew Storfer
8. Y. El-Kassaby

Citations in the corpus

• Call for a Paradigm Shift in the Genetic Management of Fragmented Populations (2018, background): “Further, the benefits persisted at least through the F2 and F3 generations, with no decline out to F16 in outbreeding species (Frankham 2016; Frankham et al. 2017).”
• Genetics and extinction and the example of Isle Royale wolves (2019, background): “In addition, meta-analysis has suggested that genetic rescue provided benefits in a very high proportion of the cases examined (Frankham, 2015) and that these benefits persist for several generations (Frankham, 2016).”