Values, Conflict, and Trust in Participatory Environmental Planning

458 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Trust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutions (2015, background): “…different types of trust include field trips, alternative dispute resolution, and other forms of less traditional engagement with antagonist groups (Beierle and Konisky 2000, Hoover and Stern 2014); setting intermediate, achievable milestones to develop rational trust (Stern and Coleman 2015); and…”
Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. (2003, background): “…and public advocacy groups agree on the importance of involving the citizenry in the decisions that affect them but are grappling with how best to do this (Rowe & Frewer, 2000; Beierle & Konisky, 2000; Graham & Phillips, 1998; Pratchett, 1999; Simrell King, 1998; Leroux, Hirtle, & Fortin, 1998).”
Deliberative Speak at the Turbine Face: Community Engagement, Wind Farms, and Renewable Energy Transitions, in Australia (2008, background): “Such assessment clearly addresses the important point of Beierle & Konisky ( 2000 , p.”
Water Management in the Camargue Biosphere Reserve: Insights from Comparative Mental Models Analysis (2011, background): “Others have viewed the main issue as a problem of dialogue on how to share a representation of the functioning of the water management system and how to learn collectively about it (Beierle and Konisky 2000, ComMod 2006).”