Metapopulation biology: past, present, and future
By Ilkka Hanski, Oscar E. Gaggiotti. 2004
89 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e06262657e25f13bd56dfd22bed491c5719c0218
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Kevin de Queiroz
- Anna‐Liisa Laine
- James I. Watling
- Y. Carrière
- A. Nowakowski
- Peter C. Ellsworth
- M. A. Donnelly
- P. Dutilleul
Citations in the corpus
- A GIS‐based approach for areawide pest management: the scales of Lygus hesperus movements to cotton from alfalfa, weeds, and cotton (2006, background): “Many integrated pest management questions can be best answered by taking a metapopulation approach (sensu Hanski & Gaggiotti, 2004), which considers simultaneously the source and sink effects of various habitat types and the effects of habitat heterogeneity on insect dispersal and habitat selection.”
- Meta‐analysis reveals the importance of matrix composition for animals in fragmented habitat (2011, background): “A large body of literature has been devoted to the application of binary models to fragmented landscape in the context of island biogeography, metacommunity, and metapopulation models (MacArthur & Wilson, 1967; Hanski & Gaggiotti, 2004; Holyoak et al., 2005).”
- Species concepts and species delimitation. (2007, background): “The term metapopulation refers to an inclusive population made up of connected subpopulations (Levins, 1970; Hanski and Gaggiotti, 2004).”
- Large‐scale spatial dynamics of a specialist plant pathogen in a fragmented landscape (2006, background): “1996; Boots & Sasaki 1999; Roy & Kirchner 2000; Thrall & Burdon 2002; Hanski & Gaggiotti 2004).”