The crisis in South Africa: Neoliberalism, financialization and uneven and combined development

By S. Ashman, B. Fine, S. Newman. 2011

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Financialization from a Marxist Perspective (2013, background): “And, for a case study of South Africa, see Ashman and Fine (2013) and Ashman, Fine, and Newman (2010, 2011, 2013).”
Financialization in Developing and Emerging Countries (2013, background): “Such creation may intertwine with other political objectives, such as the creation of a black political elite in South Africa (Ashman, Fine, and Newman 2011) or a local Malay entrepreneurial class in Malaysia (Rethel 2010).”
Financialisation in emerging economies: a systematic overview and comparison with Anglo-Saxon economies (2017, background): “In the case of EME financialisation, much of the existing research is part of either the post-Keynesian (Demir 2007, 2009; Correa, Vidal, and Marshall 2012), Marxist (Ashman, Fine, and Newman 2011; Lapavitsas 2013) or Institutionalist tradition (such as the regulationist school, Becker et al. 2010).”
Development geography II (2018, background): “The last 10 to 15 years have seen an incredible expansion in financial logics and programmes amongst individuals, households and SMEs in the Global South.”