Cascading top-down effects of changing oceanic predator abundances.
By J. Baum, Boris Worm. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2009
952 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e040269be5f201ee342b1d164e7c3fe89a4e49d6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- C. Simpfendorfer
- M. Heupel
- Boris Worm
- Manuel Guillermo Forero
- J. Emmett Duffy
- Daniel P. Costa
- Euan G. Ritchie
- Marta Coll
In Global and Planetary Change
- N. Dulvy
- C. Simpfendorfer
- Boris Worm
- M. Heupel
- J. Emmett Duffy
- Marta Coll
- G. Ballard
- Manuel Guillermo Forero
Citations in the corpus
- Global variation in marine fish body size and its role in biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (2010, background): “The most recent examples of exploitation-driven trophic cascades also come from the North Atlantic region (Frank et al. 2007, Baum & Worm 2009).”
- Sizing up the ecological role of sharks as predators (2014, background): “The loss of predation and the resultant indirect effects of mesopredator release and trophic cascades have resulted in widespread trophic downgrading of ecosystems (Crooks & Soulé 1999, Baum & Worm 2009, Estes et al. 2011).”
- Trophic cascades in the western Ross Sea, Antarctica: revisited (2015, background): “As the capacity for top-down forcing declines due to upper-level predator removal (e.g. Jackson et al. 2001, Myers & Worm 2003, Baum & Worm 2009, Estes et al. 2011, Cheung et al. 2013), and as changes associated with climate modification increase (e.g. Thomas et al. 2004, Ainley et al. 2010, Cheung…”
- Spatial management of marine resources can enhance the recovery of predators and avoid local depletion of forage fish (2012, background): “This is probably because declines in predator species have in many cases been followed by a pronounced increase in prey biomass (Myers and Worm 2003; Baum & Worm 2009), and food limitation for recovering predator populations is therefore not expected.”
- Human Involvement in Food Webs (2010, background): “In the past few years, fisheries studies with a top-down point of departure have become more frequent (74).”
- Extinction of a shark population in the Archipelago of Saint Paul's Rocks (equatorial Atlantic) inferred from the historical record (2011, background): “A well-known phenomenon is the top-down trophic cascade that may occur after the release of prey from predatory control (reviews in Heithaus et al. (2008) and Baum and Worm (2009)).”
- Changes in diet and trophic position of a top predator 10 years after a mass mortality of a key prey (2010, background): “Several studies have shown that after the disappearance of a primary prey, whether through climate-related change or commercial fisheries, seabirds exhibit decreased breeding performance and eventually lower population size (Frank et al., 2005; Myers et al., 2007; Baum and Worm, 2009).”
- Ecological role of large benthic decapods in marine ecosystems: a review (2012, background): “One of the commonly described ecosystem effects of fishing marine predators has been an increase in benthic invertebrates, including large decapod crustaceans (Baum & Worm 2009, Boudreau & Worm 2010).”
- The trophodynamics of marine top predators: Current knowledge, recent advances and challenges (2015, background): “Sharks are apex predators in most marine communities, often playing an important role in controlling community dynamics through top-down regulation of prey (Baum and Worm, 2009).”
- Ecological importance of sharks and rays in a structural foodweb analysis in southern Brazil (2014, background): “The effects of changes in one or more components within a foodweb may propagate intensely through the system, resulting in changes in the abundance and web connectivity of other species (Paine, 1969; Soulé et al., 1988; Heithaus et al., 2008; Baum and Worm, 2009; Dunne, 2009).”