An empirical comparison of two subject-specific approaches to dominant heights modeling: The dummy variable method and the mixed model method
By Mingliang Wang, B. Borders, Dehai Zhao. 2008
58 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e0380dc9af15f9f4340d1fc0e279729e74ff1388
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Forest Growth and Yield Modeling (2011, methodology): “The best method for GADA is still debated in the literature (Cieszewski and Strub, 2007; Wang et al., 2008b).”
- Estimating and predicting bark thickness for seven conifer species in the Acadian Region of North America using a mixed-effects modeling approach: comparison of model forms and subsampling strategies (2011, methodology): “In most situations, we would expect using two points would give us more accurate estimates than only using one point (e.g., Wang et al. 2008).”