QoS computation and policing in dynamic web service selection

By Yutu Liu, A. Ngu, Liangzhao Zeng. WWW Alt. '04, 2004

1,013 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Non-intrusive monitoring and service adaptation for WS-BPEL (2008, methodology): “Following [17] we distinguish between deterministic and non-deterministic QoS attributes.”
Combining global optimization with local selection for efficient QoS-aware service composition (2009, methodology): “In our study we consider quantitative non-functional properties of web services, which can be used to describe the quality criteria of a web service [24, 15].”
QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition (2004, background): “This aspect however is outside the scope of this paper (see for example reference [22]).”
Selecting skyline services for QoS-based web service composition (2010, neutral): “In [9] the authors propose an extensible QoS co mputation model that supports an open and fair management of QoS da ta by incorporating user feedback.”
QoS-based Discovery and Ranking of Web Services (2007, background): “In addition, the current solution does not differentiate between QoS properties directly supplied by service providers [7] , developing a middleware for enhancing Web service composition for monitoring metrics of QoS for Web services [10], using agents based on distributed reputation metric models…”
QoS-Based Service Selection and Ranking with Trust and Reputation Management (2005, methodology): “Our QoS provisioning model is grounded on previous work of [3, 4, 11, 13, 14].”