The use of satellite data for crop yield gap analysis

By David B. Lobell. 2013

368 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Field experiments and simulation models are useful tools for understanding crop yield gaps, but scaling up these approaches to understand entire regions over time has remained a considerable challenge. Satellite data have repeatedly been shown to provide information that, by themselves or in combination with other data and models, can accurately measure crop yields in farmers’ fields. The resulting yield maps provide a unique opportunity to overcome both spatial and temporal scaling challenges and thus improve understanding of crop yield gaps. This review discusses the use of remote sensing to measure the magnitude and causes of yield gaps. Examples from previous work demonstrate the utility of remote sensing, but many areas of possible application remain unexplored. Two simple yet useful approaches are presented that measure the persistence of yield differences between fields, which in combination with maps of average yields can be used to direct further study of specific factors. Whereas the use of remote sensing may have historically been restricted by the cost and availability of fine resolution data, this impediment is rapidly receding.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dffb8d68fee32975c08db65c8727ee7acfb33a4d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Marshall Burke
  2. George Azzari
  3. Sendhil Mullainathan
  4. Jann Spiess
  5. Stephen Aston
  6. Calum You
  7. Zhenong Jin
  8. Stefania Di Tommaso

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. Marshall Burke
  2. David B. Lobell
  3. George Azzari
  4. Sendhil Mullainathan
  5. Jann Spiess
  6. Zhenong Jin
  7. Stephen Aston
  8. Calum You

In Plant Science

  1. George Azzari
  2. Marshall Burke
  3. David B. Lobell
  4. Sendhil Mullainathan
  5. Jann Spiess
  6. Stephen Aston
  7. Calum You
  8. Zhenong Jin

Citations in the corpus