Reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated nonnormals

By B. Low. 2007

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Influence of rock property correlation on reliability analysis of rock slope stability: From property characterization to reliability analysis (2017, methodology): “Ignoring or simply assuming the correlation between c and f in a reliability analysis may lead to underestimation or overestimation of Pf (e.g., Baecher and Christian, 2003; Low, 2007; Tang et al., 2013; Wu, 2013).”
Efficient Probabilistic Algorithm Illustrated for a Rock Slope (2008, methodology): “The Sau Mau Ping rock slope was analyzed in Low (2007) using the Low and Tang (2004) approach.”
Improved knowledge-based clustered partitioning approach and its application to slope reliability analysis (2012, methodology): “qc,/ only, and both qc,/ and qz,r) using the two KCP approaches and the FORM [25].”
Response surface methods for slope reliability analysis: Review and comparison (2016, unknown): “…Wolff, 1999; Duncan, 2000; Xue and Gavin, 2007; Suchomel and Mašin, 2010), first-order reliability method (FORM) (e.g., Low and Tang, 1997, 2004; Low, 2007; Cho, 2007; Hong and Roh, 2008; Ji, 2014; Zeng and Jimenez, 2014), second-order reliability method (SORM) (e.g., Cho, 2009; Low, 2014), and…”
Stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated non-normal variables (2011, methodology): “Unfortunately, correlated non-normal inputs are commonly involved in reliability analyses for geotechnical problems [28,20].”